Multi-spot beam satellites
Edit(2017/09): this article was written early in my PhD, with little knowledge of actual systems. It happens that the Uplink/Downlink frequency bands are not so linked together. I might update this article later, or publish a new one with more accurate assumptions.
[Image perdue : System view of a DVB-S2/RCS2 satellite. The Forward link uses DVB-S2, the return link the DVB-RCS2] (images/blog/dvbrcs2-sysview.png)
Let , and be the Frequency bands for, respectively, the whole forward link (i.e. Gateway → Satellite → Users), downlink (Satellite → Users) and uplink (Gateway → Satellite).
In the simple scheme where a satellite covers a full continent with a single beam (traditional TV Broadcast model) we have this relation:
Multi-spot beam satellites allow to have different coverage beam, where the same frequencies can be used and not interfere with each other (the beams are sufficiently well focused and spaced).
[Image perdue : Ka-sat multi-spot beam coverage of europe] (images/blog/kasat.png)
In this case, a frequency can be used times, where k is the frequency reuse factor.
For example, in a 4-color distribution scheme, with 120 spots, there is a theoretical reuse factor of 20. In reality, the reuse factor is closer to 12 than 20, but that’s another topic.
In the case where the reuse factor is (meaning that a frequency is used twice over the whole coverage), taking the hypothesis of full use of the bandwidth over each spot beam, the necessary bandwidth in the uplink would be:
Extending this to , we have:
Provided that the global bandwidth for this forward link is constant , we have the following relation of the uplink bandwidth according to the reuse factor:
[Image perdue : Evolution of the uplink-to-forward bandwidth ratio according to the reuse factor k] (images/blog/ratio-ffr.png)
[Image perdue : Bandwidth repartition with frequency reuse, without over-provisionning] (images/blog/bw-division.png)
Sources: